Essay on Who Is Responsible For Bribery: Giver Or Taker in English in Very Simple Words
Essay in very simple language with the boundaries of different words here. Here you can find Essay on Who Is Responsible For Bribery: Giver Or Taker in English language for 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 or IAS, IPS Banking and other competitive exams
1 - Essay on Who Is Responsible For Bribery: Giver Or Taker - 200 Words
A bribe is usually given to get work easily and quickly. A borrower can pay cash to the borrower or the borrower. Bribery can be given as direct cash, allowances, discounts, free travel, free food, money, sponsorship, high pay job, promotions on the job, salary increase, profitable contract, commission, tip, property, jewelery, valuable items. , Or just about anything. A bribe taker sees an opportunity to make money without making much effort. In addition to those who pay bribe, those who take bribe are mutually beneficial in the event.
The practice of bribery has been going on for years. The question is whether it is the donor who is responsible for bribery or the person who has taken it from the ages has been in the minds of the people. In most cases bribery and bribe takers are responsible for this misconduct.
However, in some cases, innocent people are deprived of their original rights by those people in power. Corrupt officials demand money or other favors from them in exchange for the things and services they deserve. In such cases, the bribe taker is clearly responsible for bribe.
However, it is said that there is a mistake in the whole system. The system is responsible for bribing more than bribery or taker. Every bribe case should be investigated and the party should be severely punished by mistake.
2 - Essay on If There is No Bribe Giver There can be No Bribe Taker - 300 Words
Bribery is a heinous practice. It puts rich people in the right place and suffers the poor. Those who take bribe usually follow the path of bribe, when they have difficulty completing any other work. On the other hand, those who take bribe, take advantage of the situation and see it as an easy opportunity to make money.
Is considered responsible for bribe
Generally bribes are usually held responsible for taking bribe. A person who has decided to take a bribe for any reason, can not be treated as suffering in any way. It may be that a bargainer has also been offered an attractive offer without demand. But if he agrees to accept it and provides an illegal or legal service in return, then he is accountable for bribe.
However, to say that it is wrong to blame those who take bribe only for bribe. Bribes give their actions in exchange for bribe and are thus more responsible. However, the case is different in bribery. In such cases, those who take bribe are considered responsible for bribery and strict action is taken against them if potential bribes cancels their advances and file a legal complaint.
Bribery and bribe: A vicious cycle
It is often said that if bribery is not there, then practically the bribe takers can not be. it's really true. If someone is not ready to pay bribe then no one will be able to take it. However, it can be said that no one will ask if no bribe does not ask. Or if people stop taking bribe and dismiss it by the end then bribery will automatically stop. So, this is a vicious cycle. It is the easiest thing to blame the other, while in fact both are equally responsible for this trend.
Conclusion
A strict legal system should be implemented to stop the tyrannical cycle of giving bribe and taking. People involved in the practice should be given a severe punishment.
3 - Essay on Legal Action against Bribe Giver and Bribe Taker - 400 Words
Bribery is a person who gives money or other valuables to someone present in power to get some work done. The bribeer who wants to do the job is usually illegal. Or the legal course can be quite long and tedious, so he offers bribe to protect himself from trouble. A bribe taker is a person who demands money or other valuables in exchange for issuing any service or approving any issue. This is an opportunity to make quick money for him.
Bribes and punishment for the bribe taker
Bribery is a very corrupt practice. According to the Indian law taking bribes along with the bribe, the punishment is punishable. A person who facilitates bribe in the form of a middle person between bribery and bribe taker, is also punished. The Indian Penal Code, 1960 and the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 has declared the acts of giving and receiving bribe as a punishable offense.
Earlier, Indian law did not consider the person giving the bribe a big criminal in the form of a criminal. However, the amendment to the amendment (amendment) Bill 2018 was amended accordingly. The acts of giving and receiving bribes are now considered to be the same crime. The punishment for taking bribe has also been raised. A person convicted of bribery can be imprisoned and charged with heavy penalties.
- Minimum prison term for bribery and criminals has been extended to 3 years. To get involved in this misconduct, a fictitious penalty is also imposed. Prison can be extended up to 7 years.
- Those who are involved in repeated bribery may have to face 5 years of imprisonment. This sentence can be extended up to 10 years.
- A law has also been made to prevent bribery. The tremendous bribery establishes a victim who is usually a bribe giver. In such cases, the borrower is forced to pay an amount to complete his work, although there is no reason to keep it back. For the protection of bribery, the law works in cases where the victim reports the problem within 7 days.
- According to this new established law, people sitting in power in a commercial organization will be held responsible, when one of their employees bribe a person with their approval to pursue the interests of the organization.
Conclusion
To prevent this corrupt practice, it is necessary to punish both the bribe takers and those who give bribe. The decision to punish both sides has reduced the cases of bribe to some extent.
4 - Essay on Who is at Greater Fault: Bribe Giver or Bribe Taker - 500 Words
The act of seeking bribe is to give or receive valuable things in return for providing some kind of service (mostly illegal). Often there is a debate on who has a mistake - the person who gives bribe or the bribe of the bribe
Whereas in the present time, the law has established that both the bribes and bribes are on the same flaw, it is difficult to normalize it. It is right to say that both parties are at fault because both the pick and give bribe give rise to this corrupt behavior. However, in some cases the donor is more at fault whereas in others it is the receiver which is more at fault. Therefore, the question of who is the fault is different, in case.
The case where Jupiter Tucker is at Greater Mistake
There may be cases where the future bribeer has spent a lot of time, money and efforts on a project which is not getting clearance. While the approval process is simple, government officials are still not approve it. Lower level, middle level as well as high level government officials are also banning project approval, even if it is likely to be approved. They do not accept this project because it seems to be a good opportunity for them to make money.
The potential bribeer has already spent a lot of time and money in making his project, there is no more money and patience to prosecute government officials. They also fear that they can lose this case because at the higher level government officials are in a more powerful position than them. To save himself from all the tensions, he chooses the easy way and that is to bribe the authorities and get his work done. In this case, the bribe takers in bribery are more in comparison to those who pay bribe.
The case where the Jupiter donor is on the greatest mistake
There may be cases where a person is not ready to take a bribe, but he is threatened to present any service or to give a clean chit on any issue instead of monetary benefit. Although the potential bribe taker can still not ask for bribe and report the matter to the police, he often ends up taking bribe instead of service because it seems to be an attractive option.
The rendered service is often illegal and thus the person providing the service is as bad as the receiver. However, he often does this to clearly explain to the risk of refusing to provide service. In this case, we can say that the bribeer is in comparatively more flaw because he threatens the receiver in this situation and drives him away. However, the bribe taker can not be said to suffer outside and outside.
Conclusion
Therefore, there is no specific answer to the fact that at the time of taking bribe and bribe, who is at greater fault. Occasionally, it is bribery and at other times it is a bribe taker. However, there are many cases where bribery and bribe takers are equally at fault because they both see it as an easy choice.
5 - Essay on Who Is Responsible For Bribery: Giver Or Taker - 600 Words
Bribery is one of the most corrupt practices that catches our country. Each of us has been convicted of bribing someone at some point. It can be as small as giving bribe to our brothers and sisters to hide something from our parents or it can not happen because the traffic police officer is fined for violating the traffic rules to bribe .
Bribery offers are seen as an easy way to easily complete big tasks. On the other hand, seeking a bribe is an easy way to make money. Bribes and bribes take their predecessor forward because they are involved in this exercise. However, they do not fully understand the damage to society.
Two types of bribe
Bribery has been classified into two types - Collusive bribery and Coercive bribery Here is a brief brief about these two types of bribe:
Collusive bribe: Collusive bribe is one where both parties agree on bribe for mutual benefit. Both bribery and bribe takers are equally responsible for taking bribe in such a case. In this case both have been penalized by Indian law.
Forcibly bribe: For bribery is a force in which a bribe giver is forced to pay a bribe, in return for some service, approval or any other work, which he deserves to be legally entitled. In such a case, the bribe taker is responsible for the act of taking a bribe. He usually threatens the potential bribor and pays him cash or way. The person giving the bribe is considered to be a victim in this case rather than the culprit. Legal action is taken against the bribe taker when the report is lodged against him.
Problems of bribery in India
The practice of bribery has deep roots in India. It is prevalent for centuries. This practice was present during the era of the kings and queens and was not closed during the British rule. After independence, it has only grown so much that many laws have been established to discourage it.
Bribery and other various corrupt behaviors that affect our country are hampering its economic development. Bribes are prevalent in almost all areas of society. It happens at different levels and most of the time the system is involved in it. Bribes and bribe takers are mutually beneficial in their collaboration and ignore negative effects on others. Both are equally responsible for the act and they should be punished.
Even though strict laws have been passed to create fear among the public, this practice is still prevalent in the country. While the two criminals should be punished, in many cases they are easily overcome by this crime. The irony is that many people are capable of taking out bribe by bribing government officials. So, the problem is in the heart of the system.
Bribery is popular throughout the world
Bribery is not only prevalent in India, it is also present in various other parts of the world. Government officials and public servants who demand bribe, often pay the blame on their lower pay package. They try to earn some side income by seeking bribe. The bribeers simply complete their work simply to fulfill their demands.
That's why both of them have a mistake. In some countries where customs of bribery are common, Ukraine, South Sudan, Yemen, Morocco, DR Congo, Mongolia, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Myanmar, Afghanistan, Iraq, Nigeria and Tajikistan. There are various other corrupt services in these countries too. This is one of the main reasons why these countries are not growing at a good speed.
Conclusion
It is not enough just to impose laws against bribery and bribe takers. To overcome this problem, it is necessary to strictly enforce these laws and punish all involved.
Long Essay on Who is Responsible for Bribe - Giver or Taker in English
Introduction
Bribery is such a task when two parties collide with each other for profit in an illegal and illegal manner. To take a bribe, bribery and bribe should be in order to take revenge. The bribeer is the one who gives bribe to get a job, and who accepts the bribe, he is the bribe taker, always holds any right to perform the proposed work under his discretion.
Most of the time, this is an illegal collusion where both the takers and takers are equally responsible, but there are other situations where the bribe giver is more responsible than the taker or vice versa. Nevertheless, before the law, both of them are equally responsible and responsible for the sentence.
Bribeer
The bribe giver is the one who gives bribe. He / she is well aware of the reason behind the exchange of bribe. In the case of a bribeer, there can be two scenarios - First of all, S / B gives bribe to carry out illegal, illegal or immoral work by paying bribes.
For example - parents who offer bribes to the teacher to pass their ward in a particular subject; The motorist bribe the policeman to jump the signal etc. to not cure him.
Consider the second situation where the bribeer has to pay a bribe to do something for which he is legally authorized. For example - a citizen is bribing the transport officer so that, despite the end of all the tests, he can get his driving license; Or a financially vulnerable person who is bribing to get a subsidized gas connection, for which he is entitled to anyway.
Bribe taker
Unlike the bribeer, the bribe taker has always the right and authority to make specific decisions in favor of the bribe. He or she can either be contacted by the donor or may ask for a bribe.
We will consider some examples of bribe takers - a policeman taking bribe to let the criminal go; The ticket examiner is taking bribe to give unauthorized admission to a train etc.
For bribery, there may be different situations for bribery, that is, he can be understood, contacted, forced to take a bribe or he can demand bribe on his own. . However, in all these cases, once the bribe taker accepts the bribe / he becomes a criminal in the eyes of the law.
Who is more responsible for corruption - a bribe taker or a bribe giver?
The answer to the above question varies with the situations. Sometimes the person is more responsible in giving than the giver or vice versa, and sometimes both are equally responsible.
For example, consider a builder to get a map of a multistory building approved by the authorities of Development Authority. Now, there can be two conditions - 1) The map is very well under the prescribed rules and regulations, but the authorities (taxis) are demanding money for its approval, and 2) while preparing a draft map and builder Some criteria have been compromised for bribeing officials for their approval.
In the first case, the official acting as a bribe seeks bribe from the builder intentionally, so that necessary clearance can be given. Here the builder is a victim, who is being forced to pay bribe for anything within the purview of the law. In this case, taking a bribe is more responsible for the illegal transactions than the bribe taker.
Proceeding to the second position; Where the builder approaches the officer, he offers bribe instead of sanctioning his plan, in which there are some legal issues. In this case, if the officer accepts bribe, then he is not less responsible than the donor in any way. They are equally responsible for those who are involved in a well understood comprehension to provide mutual benefits.
Laws relating to bribery and bribe
Both bribery and bribe takers have been termed as a punishable offense by the Indian Penal Code (IPC) of 1860 and the Prevention of Corruption Act of 1988 (PCA).
The law considers bribery and bribe to be punishable with similar crimes and penalties and imprisonment.
The law also punishes the person who works as a facilitator between the two parties, the bribe taker and the bribe taker.
The Government of India approved the Prevention of Corruption (Amendment) Bill 2018, along with those who pay bribes, increase punishment for the bribe takers. Bill was brought to the bribe, which till now was considered to be a bribe taker. Now the bribes and bribe takers are liable for equal punishment in the eyes of the law.
Minimum jail term for both criminals (divers and takers) has been increased from 6 months to 3 years, with penalty of up to 7 years penalty.
Repeated criminals involved in bribery are liable for a minimum sentence of 5 years, an increase of up to 10 years.
If there is no bribe Giver, can anyone afford a bribe?
If there is no bribe taker, then the bribe taker can not be practically present. Someone should be someone who is bribing for a bribe. However, bribery may not necessarily be odd, however, the giver has to give some kind of bribe.
For any public servant who has accepted bribe, there should be someone who has offered or given a bribe. Similarly, the above statement can also be interpreted, "If there is no bribe, then there will be no bribe taker".
Bribe Giver or Bribe Taker are equally responsible
Both bribery and bribe takers are equally responsible for the crimes committed by them. The previous laws have considered those who give bribe only as abattoirs, which give them a little legal benefit to the bribe, but the Anti-Corruption (Amendment) Bill 2018 recognizes the bribe payer who owes the bribeer.
A bribe giver may have been persuaded to take force or to force it by contrary. Whatever happens, once the transaction is done between the two, they both are equally punishable under the law.
But there are some exceptions in which bribery is considered to be a victim. For example, to give a poor person a land record officer to bribe his land, which is, later, the official duty. However, if the officer constantly demands bribe, then the poor farmer has no choice but to accept his demands; In this case, the farmer gets relief from the law and it is considered as a victim rather than a criminal.
Do you think it is the right to punish the person who gives bribes or the bribe?
Well, under the law, both are equal offenders and they have to be punished equally with each other. However, there may be many complex situations for bribery exchange.
If the briborant is intentionally persuaded to give a bribe, whatever he is legally entitled to do, then in this case, in my opinion, not with the recipient of the donor as a criminal to be supposed. However, if there is collusion and the two agree on mutual agreement, then both of them are equally qualified to be penalized.
On the other hand, a bribe taker is a person who can not pretend to be a victim. There is no talk or weakness, in the argument that if a bribe taker says that he has been forced into it. Even if he was being persuaded to accept a bribe instead of favor, he always had the freedom to reject such advances.
For whatever reason, accepting a bribe, a bribe taker is more responsible for the punishment than the one paying bribe. If the bribe seeker had a desire, he would refuse to accept bribe and eliminate corruption in the bud.
Conclusion
Until the bribeers are due, the bribe takers will be there and by the time the bribe takers, the bribe takers will be the only ones. Both bribery and bribe support each other. The only way to eliminate bribe is to change yourself.
If we change ourselves, society and system will gradually change. What will happen if we take a resolution not to bribe any public servant? If we become the bribe prospective in comparison to the law-abiding citizens, then there will be no excuse for asking for it. Even if someone knowingly seeks bribe, we must also dare to reject the demand.
But, we can do this only when we are legally clean and have not committed any crime under the law. So, let the time do your course and eventually the potential bribeer will realize that he is legally obliged to fulfill his duties, even if there is no one to give a bribe.
Dear Reader, My name is Manisha Dubey Jha. I have been blogging for 3 years and through the Fast Read.in I have been giving important educational content as far as possible to the reader. Hope you like everyone, please share your classmate too. As a literature person, I am very passionate about reading and participating in my thoughts on paper. So what is better than adopting writing as a profession? With over three years of experience in the given area, I am making an online reputation for my clients. If any mistakes or wrong in the article, please suggest us @ [email protected]
Read More.